On deadline day for public input, nearly 9,000 citizens sent letters demanding protection for horses roaming Mesa Verde National Park, which wildlife officials say are trespassing and damaging a significant archaeological site.
“The horses of Mesa Verde National Park are part of the area’s natural landscape and history,” Deniz Bolbol, program director at American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign, said in a news release Monday.
“They have been present on those lands since before the park was created in 1906. We urge the Mesa Verde National Park to create a humane management plan for the horses that will preserve this unique and historic herd and protect their free-roaming behaviors, while managing their numbers through the use of humane, safe, and reversible fertility control.”
In December, The Journal reported that Mesa Verde park rangers were asking for the public’s suggestions on how to handle a band of 80 horses and 12 head of cattle at the park, about an hour’s drive west of Durango.
Under law, the animals are considered “trespass livestock” and were banned two years after Mesa Verde received the presidential designation in 1906 to protect what is considered some of the best preserved ancestral Puebloan ruins in the United States.
Cristy Brown, a public information officer for the park service, said last month the escaped livestock has damaged important archaeological sites, drained resources for indigenous species and pose a risk to visitors.
Because the animals eluded domestication long ago, escaping their enclosures and thriving on the arid land, the horses and cattle are legally considered “feral” instead of wild, and therefore do not qualify for certain federal protections.
That leaves park officials with only one legal option, Brown said, which is to remove the animals.
On Jan. 8, the wild horse preservation campaign submitted 8,982 letters on behalf citizens who would like to see the “historic herd” of horses remain on the land, and their numbers humanely managed.
“The Mesa Verde horses are an important natural and historic resource in our area,” Durango resident Kate Feldman wrote. “I and many other local citizens value this beautiful wild horse population and urge the National Park Service to protect these horses, not eradicate them.”
That not being a viable option under current policy, David Temple, president of the National Mustang Association of Colorado, wrote that the removal of the horses should be done in phases, instead of all at once.
Temple suggested using bait traps to limit the horses’ trauma, and leaving the animals on-site for holding and processing. He recommended organizing adoptions for the captured horses, and planting vaccines throughout the park to sterilize remaining bands on the land.
Brown did not respond to a call for comment. The public input portion is the second step in a nine-part process to decide how to handle the trespassing animals.
The herd became the center of controversy last year when six horses died from dehydration-related causes, sparking protests at the park when rangers refused to provide the animals water – standard protocol for wildlife management on federal lands.
“The No Action alternative is undesirable. Something needs to be done regarding these wild horses,” Temple wrote. “Making water available could help protect more sensitive areas by drawing horses away from (archaeological sites). Detrimental publicity generated by any horses dying of dehydration, starvation or other deprivation will greatly interfere with any removal program.”
The same concern was not shown to the fugitive bovines that dully graze at Mesa Verde, as far as documents released by the horse preservation campaign are concerned.
However, Dustin Stein, “low man on the totem pole” at Stubborn Farm and Burk Beef in Mancos, had his own idea in a comment on The Herald’s Dec. 9 article.
“Round them up,” he posted. “I’d be more than happy to take them to auction.”
