Advertisement

Furse fooled 80 delegates but not me

|
Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:27 PM

Editor:



After reading Patricia Robbins’ letter (Marh 1), I must concur with her.

Mcy questions are, what brought Mr Furse to this area? What is his experience in a district attorney’s office? Why did he change parties? I believe that Mr Furse was job surfing to find a candidate that could be vulnerable because of a short time in office due to a former DA’s term not completed; Russell Wasley’s short time in office was made to order. Any candidate under these circumstances will be open to criticism trying to run for office at the same time and running the office.

Being a Democrat, he was aware that the chances of being elected was slim, therefore, his change of parties.

His whining to the Central Committee was like a spoiled brat; therefore, in my humble opinion he is arrogant. He might have fooled the 80 delegates with his Obama style of “change,” but not me, I’ve seen enough of that “change.”

Give Russell Wasley a fair chance to serve a normal term, then judge him.



Darlene Clark

Cortez

Via e-mail

Advertisement