The Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy Act is yet another act intended to put another 400,000 acres in wilderness designation. It has been turned down in the past because of those who believe in multiple uses of public lands.
Rep. Joe Neguse, elected in November 2018, brings the bill forward this year. He represents District 2, with his office in Boulder.
Yes, the Thompson Divide citizens are thrilled. CORE designates the wilderness with only recreation use. They were successful in stopping mineral extraction and rescinding leases in their area. But, is more wilderness necessary also?
When the CORE Act vote was taken on Oct. 30, there had been no input from the 3rd Congressional District, which Scott Tipton represents. He attempted to include 11 amendments, which would have made this act more palatable to Western Colorado. Only three were considered.
Like much of Western Colorado, Mesa County is 70% federal land. Designating larger wilderness areas will restrict our use and growth. Does the Front Range see this as an opportunity for more water diversions?Wilderness restricts ability to fight forest fires. Not only is private property destroyed, but watersheds and drinking water are damaged. No forest management is allowed.Wilderness has harmed property rights when owners of water rights are not allowed in to repair head gates and maintain delivery systems. And grazing and mineral extraction is denied.Thank you, Rep. Scott Tipton and Sen. Cory Gardner, for thoughtfully considering all interests in Western Colorado.
Lois DunnGrand Junction